<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for STOL750 Builders Log</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stol750project.info/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stol750project.info</link>
	<description>building a STOL750 one rivet at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:44:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Engine Selection by John Edwards</title>
		<link>http://www.stol750project.info/engine-selection/#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>John Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stol750project.info/?page_id=217#comment-406</guid>
		<description>Rotax indeed seems to be the most popular despite all the AD&#039;s and service bulletins over the years. So that must be a Good engine overall.
The weight you listed for Rotax appears to be the dry weight and the weight for the air cooled UL Power is the installed weight. Add up all the cooling accesories for the Rotax(and the water) and its a whole new ball game. There must me a good reason why Zenith has now listed it 1st on their engine list and has installed it on their demo (650/750) aircraft and is in the process of making the FWF kits for the 701 too... I suspect this will be good competition for Rotax. Maybe they will come down a bit and I will be swayed to lean back in their direction. 
For now, I am going with the UL260is which appears to be about 3lbs lighter when all things are weighed in...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rotax indeed seems to be the most popular despite all the AD&#8217;s and service bulletins over the years. So that must be a Good engine overall.<br />
The weight you listed for Rotax appears to be the dry weight and the weight for the air cooled UL Power is the installed weight. Add up all the cooling accesories for the Rotax(and the water) and its a whole new ball game. There must me a good reason why Zenith has now listed it 1st on their engine list and has installed it on their demo (650/750) aircraft and is in the process of making the FWF kits for the 701 too&#8230; I suspect this will be good competition for Rotax. Maybe they will come down a bit and I will be swayed to lean back in their direction.<br />
For now, I am going with the UL260is which appears to be about 3lbs lighter when all things are weighed in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Engine Selection by Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.stol750project.info/engine-selection/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stol750project.info/?page_id=217#comment-253</guid>
		<description>Might be worth updating - or adding a row - to reflect that the O-190 corvair engine is capable of 120 hp. The O-164 is the 100 hp version. See: http://www.flycorvair.com/corvair.html#Engine Specs

I think weight is broadly the same for both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might be worth updating &#8211; or adding a row &#8211; to reflect that the O-190 corvair engine is capable of 120 hp. The O-164 is the 100 hp version. See: <a href="http://www.flycorvair.com/corvair.html#Engine" rel="nofollow">http://www.flycorvair.com/corvair.html#Engine</a> Specs</p>
<p>I think weight is broadly the same for both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Copper State Fly In, Casa Grande AZ by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.stol750project.info/2011/10/22/copper-state-fly-in-casa-grande-az/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 01:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stol750project.info/?p=347#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Wayne. Yeah, the 750 definitely puts the S in STOL, I&#039;ve seen videos with as little as 50 feet required for take off, maybe even less than that. I think it is tricycle only though there is a float kit for it, and I think makes a great amphib.

Yeah, I saw the PT-12, very beautiful as you say. And I love the Cubs too, they look like so much fun.

Thanks for reading along, I need to try and make better progress so there is something to see!

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Wayne. Yeah, the 750 definitely puts the S in STOL, I&#8217;ve seen videos with as little as 50 feet required for take off, maybe even less than that. I think it is tricycle only though there is a float kit for it, and I think makes a great amphib.</p>
<p>Yeah, I saw the PT-12, very beautiful as you say. And I love the Cubs too, they look like so much fun.</p>
<p>Thanks for reading along, I need to try and make better progress so there is something to see!</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Copper State Fly In, Casa Grande AZ by Wayne Conrad</title>
		<link>http://www.stol750project.info/2011/10/22/copper-state-fly-in-casa-grande-az/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Conrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stol750project.info/?p=347#comment-214</guid>
		<description>I walked around the ramp briefly (worked called &amp; I had to leave far before I got my fill) and saw those 750&#039;s, although I didn&#039;t recognize them at the time as the plane you&#039;re building.  My first and continuing impression of the wing was, &quot;Oh my that&#039;s a barrel full of lift!&quot;  I&#039;m guessing that the short-field performance must be pretty good.  it looks like it would be nice with conventional gear--do you have a choice with this plane, or is it tricycle only?

The fellow with that beautiful Ryan PT-12 was there again this year.  Did you see it?  This year I got to talk to him and thank him for flying her in, which was nice.

The polished BE-18 was nothing short of brilliant in the desert sun.  What a beauty.

I have to admit I&#039;m a big fan of tube and fabric, though.  Fully half the pictures on my camera are of Cubs and their cousins.

Anyhow, nice job on your continued build.  It&#039;s been fun to follow along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I walked around the ramp briefly (worked called &amp; I had to leave far before I got my fill) and saw those 750&#8242;s, although I didn&#8217;t recognize them at the time as the plane you&#8217;re building.  My first and continuing impression of the wing was, &#8220;Oh my that&#8217;s a barrel full of lift!&#8221;  I&#8217;m guessing that the short-field performance must be pretty good.  it looks like it would be nice with conventional gear&#8211;do you have a choice with this plane, or is it tricycle only?</p>
<p>The fellow with that beautiful Ryan PT-12 was there again this year.  Did you see it?  This year I got to talk to him and thank him for flying her in, which was nice.</p>
<p>The polished BE-18 was nothing short of brilliant in the desert sun.  What a beauty.</p>
<p>I have to admit I&#8217;m a big fan of tube and fabric, though.  Fully half the pictures on my camera are of Cubs and their cousins.</p>
<p>Anyhow, nice job on your continued build.  It&#8217;s been fun to follow along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Day 40: Rear Bracket Hinge Fix (20m) by zihad</title>
		<link>http://www.stol750project.info/2011/04/10/day-40-rear-bracket-hinge-fix-20m/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>zihad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 04:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stol750project.info/?p=264#comment-211</guid>
		<description>Do you know what is the torque value for this AN3 bolt?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know what is the torque value for this AN3 bolt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wings Arrival (for real) by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.stol750project.info/2011/07/22/wings-arrival-for-real/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stol750project.info/?p=311#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Hi Louise, I think you will be an old maid before this thing is ready to be flown!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Louise, I think you will be an old maid before this thing is ready to be flown!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wings Arrival (for real) by Louise Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.stol750project.info/2011/07/22/wings-arrival-for-real/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Louise Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stol750project.info/?p=311#comment-151</guid>
		<description>It looks like you&#039;re doing well. I can&#039;t wait until we get a pic of it when it&#039;s all completed and ready to be flown :-)

x</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like you&#8217;re doing well. I can&#8217;t wait until we get a pic of it when it&#8217;s all completed and ready to be flown <img src='http://www.stol750project.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>x</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Day 50: Upper and Lower Horns (1 hr 45m) by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.stol750project.info/2011/07/02/day-50-upper-and-lower-horns-1-hr-45m/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 18:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stol750project.info/?p=294#comment-148</guid>
		<description>Hi Zihad

Thanks for checking out my blog and good luck with your plane build. I think I got the horn angle right, I don&#039;t notice anything misaligned, but I didn&#039;t do anything special as far as I can remember.

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Zihad</p>
<p>Thanks for checking out my blog and good luck with your plane build. I think I got the horn angle right, I don&#8217;t notice anything misaligned, but I didn&#8217;t do anything special as far as I can remember.</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Engine Selection by Sebastien Heintz</title>
		<link>http://www.stol750project.info/engine-selection/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastien Heintz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 23:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stol750project.info/?page_id=217#comment-144</guid>
		<description>Great chart - we get many requests for a good comparison of all available suitable engines.  If you can, expand on it and add spec comparions:  cc, drive system, cooling system, etc., etc.  Additional factors:  service and support, warranty, fuel consumption, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great chart &#8211; we get many requests for a good comparison of all available suitable engines.  If you can, expand on it and add spec comparions:  cc, drive system, cooling system, etc., etc.  Additional factors:  service and support, warranty, fuel consumption, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Day 50: Upper and Lower Horns (1 hr 45m) by zihad</title>
		<link>http://www.stol750project.info/2011/07/02/day-50-upper-and-lower-horns-1-hr-45m/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>zihad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 03:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stol750project.info/?p=294#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Hi there,

congratulations for the ch750 building, and as i can see, you are working on it alone. double congrats to you.

i want to ask, as we are in the same boat building this nice ch750, about the HORN ANGLE.

once you make a line on the spar (8 mm to the left), then, we are asked to align the horn angle to the line that we have just made. did you get the horn angle aligned with the line on the spar? i didnt get these two parts align because there are about 1-2 mm mis aligned. 

so, do you get this right?

thanks

zihad,
malaysia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>congratulations for the ch750 building, and as i can see, you are working on it alone. double congrats to you.</p>
<p>i want to ask, as we are in the same boat building this nice ch750, about the HORN ANGLE.</p>
<p>once you make a line on the spar (8 mm to the left), then, we are asked to align the horn angle to the line that we have just made. did you get the horn angle aligned with the line on the spar? i didnt get these two parts align because there are about 1-2 mm mis aligned. </p>
<p>so, do you get this right?</p>
<p>thanks</p>
<p>zihad,<br />
malaysia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

